Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Biogenic Carbon

In 2026 Q3, new biogenic carbon flows were added to the Federal Elementary Flow List (FEDEFL). Recommended approaches to modeling with these flows are provided below.

Two accounting approaches

By default, all LCIA methods will be made available using the 0/0 approach for the FLCAC. Versions using the -1/+1 approach will be made available in the future. Data providers are encouraged to model their flows to facilitate the use of the -1/+1 approach, and to indicate when that is not feasible. In doing so, the 0/0 approach will also be applicable.

Flow characterization

Carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide, biogenic resource flows must always be paired with their corresponding emission flow to arrive at a correct, net characterization. For example, carbon dioxide resource flows cannot be paired with carbon dioxide, biogenic emission flows because the carbon source reservoirs and accounting approaches differ.

Characterization factors for carbon dioxide are identical for both accounting methods.

Biotic resource flows such as carbon / resource / biotic are not characterized and cannot be used directly for GWP accounting.

Carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide, biogenic / emission / water flows are available, but are not characterized in any GHG method and are generally not recommended for use under the assumption that any CO2 dissolved in water is likely to reach equilibrium and enter the atmosphere.

Table 1:Carbon dioxide flow characterization

Flow directionCompartmentFlow
Carbon dioxide
synonym: "carbon dioxide, fossil"
Carbon dioxide, biogenic
synonym: "carbon dioxide, non-fossil"
Carbon dioxide, land use change
synonym: "carbon dioxide, from soil or biomass stock"
InputResource/groundGWP: 0GWP 0/0: +1 [1]
GWP -1/+1: 0
n.a.
Use: Track carbon content in fossil fuels, peat or underground CO2 reservoirs.Use: Track biogenic C extracted from soil. Uncommon.
Subcompartment(s):
only use resource/ground/subterranean
Resource/airGWP: -1GWP 0/0: 0
GWP -1/+1: -1
n.a.
Use: Anthropogenic sequestration (e.g., direct air capture)Use: Track carbon incorporated in living things (e.g., photosynthesis).
Subcompartment(s):
resource/air/troposphere (preferred)
Subcompartment(s):
resource/air/troposphere (preferred)
OutputEmission/airGWP: +1GWP 0/0: 0
GWP -1/+1: +1
GWP: +1
Use: Fossil combustion emissionsUse: Track biogenic emissions (e.g. combustion or decomposition).
Use: Track emissions from direct and indirect land use change.
Emission/waterGWP: not characterizedGWP: not characterizedn.a.
Use: Track the quantity of CO2 emitted to air.Use: Track the quantity of CO2 emitted to air.
Emission/groundGWP: 0GWP 0/0: -1
GWP -1/+1: 0
n.a.
Use: Underground sequestration. Assume permanence, else report emissions to air.Use: Model underground sequestration or storage in long-term soil carbon. Assume permanence, else report emissions to air.
Subcompartment(s):
emission / ground / subterranean
Subcompartment(s):
Underground storage - emission / ground / subterranean
Soil storage - emission / ground / {terrestrial or human-dominated}

[1] Why is `carbon dioxide, biogenic / resource / ground` a +1 (in 0/0 method)? In this simplified modeling approach (biogenic emissions = 0), carbon removed from the ground must be offset by the credit earned when it is returned to the ground via `carbon dioxide, biogenic / emission / ground`. Inventory will need to be adjusted if carbon is stored in a product for a given study scope.

Examples of modeling approach

Footnotes
  1. There is not complete agreement between different standards and LCIA methods regarding what represents short-term, though < 100 years is a common benchmark.